Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

The construction of Baltimore and Ohio was an amazing phenomenon, and it explicitly describes the process of designing and building the most important and prominent early American railroad. It is a key commitment to rail route history as well as to the most extensive history of the improvement of the United States in the first half of the nineteenth century. The development of the 380-mile line from Baltimore to the Ohio River over a period of 25 years is a historic event of arrangement and imaginative design that overcame a great number of obstructions; this was witnessed by a hard crossing of 200 miles of mountain wilderness. Its success gave a spur to inner development throughout the United States. The B&O railways represented development, not just in the improvement and growth of the Western economy but also in the pleasure that an individual could travel easily, and the transportation of cargo could be significantly quicker, better, and less expensive. The railroad thoroughly promoted the improvement of the Baltimore port, industry, urban growth, and also its economy, communication, and social establishments. During its construction, various classes of the workforce were involved, for example, financial stakeholders, government representatives, structural specialists, innovators and mechanics, forepersons, and temporary workers who together assembled the first long-distance, extremely useful railroad in the United States.

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Summary of the Project

The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad project had been in existence for about 160 years before having been incorporated into a larger association. The project was initiated in 1827, and it was the first commercial railroad track in the United States at that time. Baltimore, Maryland, was a city that was developing quickly in the early nineteenth century. The city area between the eastern seaboard and a well-established port made it a notable possibility for the exchange center and construction of the railroad. It was 40 sections of land belonging to the Museum that Baltimore specialists, surveyors, and architects started the construction of this railroad on in 1829. They began by laying a long-distance track, connecting the first passenger station and developing America’s first classic railroad. Railroad work was conducted for more than 130 years at Mt. Clare, an Affiliate of the Smithsonian, a National Historic Landmark, Museum, and independent educational asset. The development of trenches as shift courses, most prominently the 1820 opening of New York’s Erie Canal, motivated the development of railroad lines. In 1827, a group of traders and investors pooled their cash, amounting to three million dollars, and established the railroad. The most prominent among this group of wealthy Americans were George Brown and Philip Thomas, who had spent the previous year examining railways in England. The Baltimore part was sufficiently simpler to choose. Development started vigorously in 1828 with the earth breaking which was controlled by Charles Carroll, a facilitator of the Declaration of Independence (Stover, 1995).

The main part of the line was completed in Maryland, from Baltimore in the extreme east to Sandy Hook in the west. The primary part opened for business in 1830, complete with a distributed timetable and an endorsed charge for a one-and-a-half-mile excursion of 9 cents. Construction proceeded, and the line crossed the Potomac River and extended into Virginia and after that again into Maryland, at Cumberland. After this, there was the initiation of a contract for constructing a rail track to connect Baltimore to Washington, D.C., which happened in 1831. The cargo loads, passenger numbers, and benefits developed alongside the number of miles covered by the track. In 1854, it could boast of 380 miles covered by the track. The number of stakeholders increased as well. The initial choice of the organization to issue a share of stock changed into a prize for financial specialists in 1859 when the organization interestingly allocated some benefits to its shareholders (Kirk, 2008).

Independence Day represented how society made ceremonies in which they used Durkheim’s innovation and compared America with different civic establishments. For example, Daniel Webster, talking about the progression of the new expansion to the statehouse building in Washington on July 4, 1851, said that the system of the railroad and telegraphic lines by which this incomprehensible nation was reticulated created an asset as well as united its constituents vehemently in groups forming the part of the union. The waterways of New York, Philadelphia, and Boston exceeded in degree and significance those of old Rome. Likewise, the ideas represented the initiation of new waterways, railroads, extensions, and structures. The significance of the innovation for individual capacities was seen to be considerable in July 1817 when Governor De Witt Clinton pushed a spade into the ground to begin the digging of the Erie Canal. Later, Independence Day of 1820 initiated the official opening of the track that was to connect the area with the Erie waterway. It became the beginning of the development of the Pennsylvania Grand Canal in 1826, the Baltimore and Ohio Canal in 1828, the introduction of the Boston and Worcester Railroad in 1835, the commitment of the Eads Bridge in St. Louis. The design prepared on the Erie Canal contributed a lot from the place that developed a lot of its new foundation (Takacs, 2015).

In 1792, Pennsylvanians kept in touch with Britain, requesting a structural designer who was to assume the responsibility of waterway and street building. It attracted the main structural specialist in Britain, William Jessop, who suggested the appointment of William Weston, who later was used on the Oxford Canal and had likewise constructed a huge three-compass road span over the wide Trent at Gainsborough in 1786. He was identified with Samuel Weston, a master who had split away at the Chester and Oxford Canals in Britain, studied the Kennet and Avon, and proposed Hampton Gay Canal. William settled in Philadelphia with his wife in January 1793 and quickly went to work, marking locks for the Schuylkill and Susquehanna Canal. He used a modern optical level, the Troughton Wye Level, which had been discovered in the USA; however, it was soon being used by each channel venture there (Stover, 1995).

How the Project Was Built

The development started on July 4, 1828. There was the introduction of tracks that were assembled with rock stringers reinforced by strap iron rails. The main portion from West Baltimore to Ellicott’s Mill was opened on May 24, 1830. The designers were interested in the Patapsco River where they picked a point and linked it to another point near Parr’s Ridge. It was the proposed point where the railroad was to cross and then drop into the valley of the Potomac streams and Monocracy. Further were initiated Frederick in December 1831 and the Point of Rocks in April the following year, Sandy Hook in December 1834, Martinsburg in May 1842, Hancock in June 1842, Cumberland in November 1842, and Piedmont in July 1851. The limited portion of the accessible area along the Potomac River from Point of Rocks to Harpers Ferry caused a fight in court between the B&O and the Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O) Canal as both wanted to prevent the other from using it. A later agreement permitted the two organizations to share the privilege of the way (Kirk, 2008).

The railroad extremely influenced the development of the Baltimore port, industry, urban setting, money-related education, and social foundations. Maryland permitted the B&O to develop a railroad from Baltimore to Washington in 1831, and the Washington Branch opened and joined the main track at Relay, Maryland, crossing the Patapsco on the Thomas Viaduct, which remains one of the B&O essential structures. This railroad was mostly upheld by the state and worked on freely up to the 1870s when the state took twenty percent of gross transportation fees for the goods that were ferried using this railroad. This line was much more valuable compared to the first one in the mainline. In any case, the rail was not used anymore for any new developments. Most of the stone extraction on the Olopmentld, which was the main rail, did not continue operating since it was swept away by the irregular flooding of Patapsco River and was replaced by Bollman support spans. Those located on the portion of Elk Ridge Railroad joined Annapolis with this line at Annapolis junction by the year 1840. As a traditional state of the agreement, it was realized that the state could not get any connecting line between Washington and Baltimore (Stover, 1995).

Right when the progress started on the proposed railroad line in the 1820s, the B&O railroad building was at its introductory stage. Being uncertain as to which materials were to suffice, the B&O resorted to sturdiness and gathered an important number of its starting structures of rock. Without a doubt, even the track strip on which the iron strap rail was to be joined included the stone.

Despite the fact that the stone soon proved excessively unrewarding and expensive for the track, most of the B&O structures have survived until today, and various changing railroad elements are still used by CSX. The Baltimore Carrollton Viaduct that was named after Charles Carroll of Carrollton, who made the first expansion proposal on the project, has been the world’s most stable railroad platform until the present. The Thomas Viaduct is the world’s largest arched stone bridge that is named after the president of B&O at that time. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroads made wide usage of the Bollman’s iron reinforcement expansion arrangement in the mid-nineteenth century. Its strength and straightforwardness promoted speedier railroad improvements (Kirk, 2008).

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad assembled the basic rail to Parr’s Ridge, which gathered information about the functioning of the steam engine trains. The association was not sure whether the traction of the metal wheels would be adequate to hold the train on rails while the engine would pull it to the highest point. The railroad created two inclined planes on each side of the edge along which gatherings of stallions, and possibly steam-controlled winches, would pull the trains. The planes, about a mile in length on each side of the edge, instantly showed a functional bottleneck and were to be done in the 1830s. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad made a 5.5-mile equivalent to an 8.9 km long reinforcement approach, later known as Mount Airy Loop. The planes were instantly abandoned and ignored. Then again, a couple of antiquated rarities survived to the present.

By1843, the Congress had approximately 30,000 US dollars for the advancement of a trial 38-mile, which constituted 61 km, show line connecting Washington, D.C., and Baltimore along the Baltimore & Ohio railroad. The B&O confirmed the endeavor with the affirmation that the track would have freed the utilization of the trail upon its fulfillment. An incredible show happened in 1844 when the news concerning the Whig Party’s appointment of Henry Clay to represent the U.S. President was broadcasted in the party’s tradition in Baltimore where it was taken to the Capitol Building in Washington. In May 1844, the track was finally initiated when Samuel sent his clearly understood words “What hath God made” from the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Mount Clare Station to Capitol Building where the initiation was being performed through a telephone (Takacs, 2015).

The project transformed into the first authorized railroad in the U.S.; 20,000 professionals received five million dollars to be used in the transportation of the moving stock and manufacture of the line. It was a business and fiscal accomplishment that planned various new regulatory strategies that got the chance to become approved practices in the railroad field, which sky-lifted the business. The B&O transformed into the first association to work on a train fabricated in America, the “Tom Thumb,” in 1829. It amassed the first explorer and freight station on Mount Clare in 1829, which was the railroad that first earned passenger livelihood in December 1829, and conveyed a timetable by May 1830. In December 1852, it transformed into the first track line to connect the Ohio River from the eastern seaboard to the mainline (Stover, 1995).

The disconnected government ownership hampered the operation of the railroad. Out of the thirty people of its top administrative staff, twelve were presented by proprietors, while the eighteen operated on behalf of either Baltimore City Council or Maryland. Both groups had conflicting interests: the boss named by the city and state looked for low charges and all advancements bolstered from corporate salaries, while the officials picked by shareholders longed for more noticeable advantages and benefits. These conflicts became more remarkable by the 1850s after the completion of the C&O Canal, which added competition to the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad among transport organizations. In 1858, after being assigned by the shareholder and official John Hopkins, John W. Garrett got the opportunity to be the president of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, a position that he held until his death in 1884. In the first year of his office, corporate working costs were diminished from 65 percent to 46 percent, and the railroad began passing on advantages to its shareholders (Kirk, 2008).

Abolitionists ceased a train amid John Brown’s strike regarding the government arms stockpile at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, which was later known as the piece of West Virginia. Garrett broadcasted the Civil War, and the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad train conveyed government troops led by Robert E. Lee to catch the abolitionists and John Brown.

At the start of this War, the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad possessed 236 trains, 128 traveler mentors, 3,451 steam trains and constructed 513 miles of the railroad so far, all in states that were in the south of the Mason–Dixon track. Albeit numerous Marylanders had Southern sensitivities, Garrett and Hopkins upheld the Union. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was effective in supporting the central government during the Civil War as it was the fundamental rail association that existed between the northern states and Washington, DC. Accordingly, 143 strikes and fights during the war employed the B&O Railroad; numerous subsequent confrontations were a considerable misfortune (Takacs, 2015).

There was also fast development, combined with uneven financial conditions during the Reconstruction, which was caused by numerous battles between railroad specialists and administration, as well as between different railways and organizations. In 1877, the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad reduced the wages by almost half. The outcome of this resulted in the Strike of 1877. Distress was widespread to the point that the administrators of Pennsylvania and Maryland withdrew from the state for a volunteer army to deal with it. Uproars included around 15,000 people who were found at the Camden Station and other stations, while other individuals were executed. The landing of government troops quieted the scenes (Stover, 1995).

During the open movement of the Civil War, there was a huge arrangement of assaults directed by Stonewall Jackson. Before the end of 1861, 23 Baltimore & Ohio Railroad extensions had been burned, 102 miles that approximated 164 km of the broadcast line were chopped down, 36.5 miles (58.7 km) of rail was pulverized or torn, 42 trains were blazed, 14 trains were caught, and 386 rail autos stolen and demolished. Through these activities, operations of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad were completely shut down for ten months. Until the end of March 1862, the organization of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was restored. Toward the final day, train development was sporadic and subject to unending stoppages, crashes catches, and strikes (Kirk, 2008).

The company was financing development, while some portion of the general administration of the railroad assumed a vital part in deciding the velocity at which the work went ahead. Once the area surveys were made, the privileges of the path had to be worked on; after that, last development studies were required. These overviews proceeded all through the development period and required reviewing gatherings at continuous interims along the line. The cut and filled roadbed disregarded uneven ground; a wide range of earth materials was procured to ditch the trench and release the stormwater. Burrows in strong rock could be left uncovered, yet numerous different passages had to be lined with timber, block, stone, or cement. Scaffolds had to be planned and raised in front of the track. Ducts of stone or cement were used in the construction of bedding (Takacs, 2015).

The track, rails, switches, and different things were transported to the development terminals from inaccessible areas and conveyed from that point to the end of the track. Sidings and station tracks were constructed alongside the primary line. The stabilizer was brought from far off quarries, put in position, and the tract was conveyed to the line on an even review. Station houses with water tanks for the trains, eating houses on long lines, and comparative structures were likewise equally fundamental. Machine repair shops and motor houses were situated at precisely chosen locations. The procurement of fuel had to be made and put away in the full amount at division focuses. Transporting loads by trains, cargo and traveler autos, and development trains were likewise a critical and excessive aspect in Central Pacific development. A broadcast line had to be manufactured as an extra to the development strengths. In numerous spots, a wagon road coming to the front of the track was required. At that point, as well, there had to be an assembled power of trainmen, graders, span manufacturers, groups, and earth-moving hardware; lastly, there was the need in the power that would maintain and work the railroad when development was done. Overall, there were the union, the designing staff with the chief designer and his colleagues, the development director and partners, contractual workers for different sorts of work, and numerous different groups of talented men for performing unique undertakings (Stover, 1995).

Struggling with your essay?

Ask professionals to help you!

Start Chat

How the Project Could Be Built at Present

If the project were built today, the rail could be welded in long lengths, which could be up to several meters in length. Because of the high advancements that have been developed, the rail would be of the cutting edge nature. Since rail tends to inch in the primary bearing of travel, rail grapples could be introduced at interims along the track. They could be fitted with the rail against the base plate to function as an obstacle to development. The rail could be welded, and rail lengths could be utilized to give a superior ride, decrease wear, diminish harm, and reduce the clamor connected with rail joints. In order to guarantee that the way in which they are required for those sections of trains are kept clear near the course of a railroad, a structure gauge should be forced. Gauging trains could be fitted with either optical or laser gear. The optical framework utilizes light emissions from the train as it keeps running along the track. More suitable cameras may be mounted to record the breaks (Kirk, 2008).