First of all, it should be said that the Asian region has changed in the last decades. Today, the Asian countries have other state branding, business environments, the world’s position, and reputation. China has surprised the world by its brash development that scholars called “the Asian miracle”. Today, India replaced China in the context of “the Asian miracle”. These two states have achieved such great outcomes owing to their own development paths. However, not only India and China have changed in recent years. The world has known the UAE and Qatar from the other side. The first has created its own state branding among the Asian states; the second had been creating it. The states are known as wealthy countries. Nowadays, the international community is interested in these states since they are very attractive as the partners. Their development paths have similarities and distinctions.
The Similarities of the UAE and Qatar Development Paths and Ambitious
The states have a large number of similarities. In fact, the last one is connected with geographic placement, cultural and financial opportunities. The United Arabic Emirates and Qatar are the richest countries not only in the Middle West but among the countries from the other parts of the globe. The states have the immense reserves of oil; Qatar has larger reserves of the gas. Thus, it means they are really wealthy countries; as a result, states have strong opportunities for successful development. As for development paths, they really have a set of similarities; however, each of them comprises the features. The last one is explored by different scholars, but this coursework is based on Hvidt’s and Peterson’s works. The first author has researched the ambitions and development paths of the UAE. Having analyzed his work, it can be said that Hvidt’s model cannot be applied to Qatar, as well. Qatar is smaller than the UAE several times so the state has fewer opportunities. According to the Hvidt’s model, the UAE has nine key parameters: government-led development, flexible labor force, fast decision making, bypass of industrialization, internationalism of service provision, and the creation of investment opportunities, supply-generated demand, and market position via branding, development in cooperation with international partners. Qatar has the same process of elaboration regarding the government-led development and market position. Despite, it is important to note that the government is focused on international intervention and approval in the current domestic situation to a greater degree than the UAE. The United Arab Emirates is stronger in regard to fast decision making since the level of the bureaucracy in the government entities is less than in Qatar. One of main Qatar’s problems that hinder its full behavior includes in a great degree the political fragmentation. The UAE is managed by the ruler and his four most trusted men who have been placed in charge of key economic activities. However, the set of ambitions is the same in both states. They are developing the educating system in the countries, the media industry, and their own airlines. Consequently, the states develop their state branding via the ranged things above.
It can be said that Peterson’s argument about the reasons behind Qatar’s drive can not completely explain the UAE behavior. The author makes emphasize on the importance of the state brand. To my mind, the United Arabic Emirates has achieved great outcomes in state branding. Today, all over the world knows this country as development state that has its own visions of the world, its placement in the international community, elaborates real estate sectors, has perfect living standards. Furthermore, the government provides all the possible in order to enhance the business environment in the state. First of all, I would like to emphasize on the right policy of the government. The main initiator in the relationship between the private and state sectors is the government. Secondarily, the low level of bureaucracy plays a significant role in the development of the domestic business environment. Thirdly, the government of the UAE creates investment opportunities, which definitely develop the current economic situation in the state. It should be underlined that Qatar has not such good advanced state branding. However, through the years, the country can seem from other sides. Earlier, Qatar has been just the oil-producing and gas-producing state; today, it is also the place for the sports events; it has the own airlines and organizes the shopping and cultural festivals. Indeed, the country develops in the same ways as its neighbors. As for Peterson’s mind, it will be one of the greatest mistakes in Qatar’s development path.
Have explored all the information above, it can be summed up the United Arab Emirates and Qatar have a large number of similarities of the development paths and ambitions. The UAE created its own development paths earlier than Qatar, as it has been noticed, the last tends to collaborate like UAE. To my mind, if Qatar applies all the features of Dubai’s model, it will not be able to achieve really great success in its behaviors. As it can seem on China’s and India’s example, the achievement will be obtained only that countries which do not resemble other states, and have their own behavior paths. The main disadvantage of the country includes really small territory, and the main advantage is the strong financial opportunities that help this country to develop its international position on the globe.